<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cornegy 2009 Blog: Improving Community Parks And Playgrounds</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nostrandpark.com/2009/04/27/cornegy-2009-blog-improving-community-parks-and-playgrounds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nostrandpark.com/2009/04/27/cornegy-2009-blog-improving-community-parks-and-playgrounds/</link>
	<description>Bringing Together the Best of Crown Heights</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 15:44:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why-fi in Brower Park? Why not</title>
		<link>http://nostrandpark.com/2009/04/27/cornegy-2009-blog-improving-community-parks-and-playgrounds/comment-page-1/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>Why-fi in Brower Park? Why not</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 15:22:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nostrandpark.com/?p=177#comment-14</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] program to add Wifi in v&amp;#97&amp;#114&amp;#105ous parks across the city, including in 8 parks in&amp;#32&amp;#66&amp;#114ooklyn.  While we could not determine whether Bro&amp;#119&amp;#101&amp;#114 Park or St. Johns Park would be included in the r&amp;#97&amp;#110&amp;#107s, we are curious what residents think of the idea&amp;#46&amp;#10&amp;#82elated NP post(s): Improving Community Parks and P&amp;#108&amp;#97&amp;#121grounds [...] &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] program to add Wifi in v&amp;#97&amp;#114&amp;#105ous parks across the city, including in 8 parks in&amp;#32&amp;#66&amp;#114ooklyn.  While we could not determine whether Bro&amp;#119&amp;#101&amp;#114 Park or St. Johns Park would be included in the r&amp;#97&amp;#110&amp;#107s, we are curious what residents think of the idea&amp;#46&amp;#10&amp;#82elated NP post(s): Improving Community Parks and P&amp;#108&amp;#97&amp;#121grounds [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

